![]()
Certificate: View Certificate
Published Paper PDF: View PDF
Confirmation Letter: View
DOI: https://doi.org/10.63345/ijrmp.v12.i10.5
Dr. Sohrab Bharucha
Director Operations
Spica Group
Pune, Maharashtra, India
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4195-6191
Abstract— Multi-generational family businesses play a critical role in global economic development, yet many struggle to maintain long-term continuity due to fragmented governance structures, succession challenges, increasing organizational complexity, and the rapid pace of digital transformation. Existing governance models primarily address individual dimensions such as corporate governance, family governance, or succession planning in isolation, offering limited support for integrating these elements into a unified decision-making framework. Furthermore, current approaches rarely incorporate governance maturity assessment, innovation oversight, digital governance capabilities, sustainability objectives, and quantitative performance evaluation within a single governance architecture. To address these research gaps, this paper proposes a Next-Generation Governance Framework (NGGF) that combines corporate governance, family governance, succession governance, innovation governance, sustainability governance, and performance governance into a comprehensive governance model for multi-generational family enterprises. The framework introduces a quantitative Governance Maturity Score (GMS), Governance Readiness Index (GRI), Governance Risk (GR), Innovation Governance (IG), and Successor Readiness (SR) models to objectively evaluate governance effectiveness and organizational preparedness. The proposed methodology is validated through an empirical study involving 312 multi-generational family businesses using structured governance indicators and statistical techniques including reliability analysis, factor analysis, multiple regression, and structural equation modeling. Experimental results demonstrate that organizations implementing NGGF achieve higher governance maturity, stronger succession readiness, improved governance transparency, enhanced innovation capability, reduced governance risks, and greater long-term organizational resilience compared with conventional governance approaches. The structural model exhibits strong explanatory capability (R² = 0.87), confirming the positive contribution of integrated governance mechanisms to sustainable business continuity. The proposed framework provides a scalable and practical governance model that supports professional management, preserves family legacy, strengthens strategic decision-making, and enables sustainable value creation across successive generations. The findings contribute to the advancement of governance research by presenting an integrated, measurable, and future-oriented governance architecture suitable for modern family enterprises.
Keywords— Family business governance, multi-generational family enterprises, corporate governance, family governance, succession planning
References
- K. Z. Heck and E. S. Trent, “The Prevalence of Family Business from a Household Sample,” Family Business Review, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 209–224, 1999, doi: 10.1111/j.1741-6248.1999.00209.x.
- J. Chrisman, J. H. Chua, and P. Sharma, “Trends and Directions in the Development of a Strategic Management Theory of the Family Firm,” Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, vol. 29, no. 5, pp. 555–575, 2005, doi: 10.1111/j.1540-6520.2005.00098.x.
- Morck and B. Yeung, “Agency Problems in Large Family Business Groups,” Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, vol. 27, no. 4, pp. 367–382, 2003, doi: 10.1111/1540-8520.t01-1-00015.
- A. Zahra, “Entrepreneurial Risk Taking in Family Firms,” Family Business Review, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 23–40, 2005, doi: 10.1111/j.1741-6248.2005.00028.x.
- Miller, I. Le Breton-Miller, and B. Scholnick, “Stewardship vs. Stagnation: An Empirical Comparison of Small Family and Non-Family Businesses,” Journal of Management Studies, vol. 45, no. 1, pp. 51–78, 2008, doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6486.2007.00718.x.
- Miller and I. Le Breton-Miller, “Family Governance and Firm Performance: Agency, Stewardship, and Capabilities,” Family Business Review, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 73–87, 2006, doi: 10.1111/j.1741-6248.2006.00063.x.
- Sharma, J. J. Chrisman, and J. H. Chua, “Succession Planning as Planned Behavior: Some Empirical Results,” Family Business Review, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 1–15, 2003, doi: 10.1111/j.1741-6248.2003.00001.x.
- Le Breton-Miller, D. Miller, and L. P. Steier, “Toward an Integrative Model of Effective FOB Succession,” Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, vol. 28, no. 4, pp. 305–328, 2004, doi: 10.1111/j.1540-6520.2004.00047.x.
- Umans, N. Lybaert, T. Steijvers, and W. Voordeckers, “Succession Planning in Family Firms: Family Governance Practices, Board of Directors, and Emotions,” Small Business Economics, vol. 54, pp. 189–207, 2020, doi: 10.1007/s11187-018-0078-5.
- R. Gomez-Mejia, K. T. Haynes, M. Núñez-Nickel, K. J. L. Jacobson, and J. Moyano-Fuentes, “Socioemotional Wealth and Business Risks in Family-Controlled Firms,” Administrative Science Quarterly, vol. 52, no. 1, pp. 106–137, 2007, doi: 10.2189/asqu.52.1.106.
- Berrone, C. Cruz, and L. R. Gomez-Mejia, “Socioemotional Wealth in Family Firms,” Family Business Review, vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 258–279, 2012, doi: 10.1177/0894486511435355.
- Sciascia and P. Mazzola, “Family Involvement in Ownership and Management: Exploring Nonlinear Effects on Performance,” Family Business Review, vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 331–345, 2008, doi: 10.1177/08944865080210040105.
- G. Sirmon and M. A. Hitt, “Managing Resources: Linking Unique Resources, Management, and Wealth Creation in Family Firms,” Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, vol. 27, no. 4, pp. 339–358, 2003, doi: 10.1111/1540-8520.t01-1-00013.
- Carney, “Corporate Governance and Competitive Advantage in Family-Controlled Firms,” Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 249–265, 2005, doi: 10.1111/j.1540-6520.2005.00081.x.
- A. Zahra, J. C. Hayton, and C. Salvato, “Entrepreneurship in Family vs. Non-Family Firms,” Journal of Business Venturing, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 363–381, 2004, doi: 10.1016/S0883-9026(03)00036-5.